J Electrodiagn Neuromuscul Dis Search


J Electrodiagn Neuromuscul Dis > Volume 23(3); 2021 > Article
탈수초신경병으로 최초 진단 후 유전성Transthyretin아밀로이드증으로 최종 진단된 증례 모음


Transthyretin amyloidosis (aTTR) is a life-threatening type of systemic amyloidosis that has been associated with autosomal dominant mutations in thetransthyretin gene. In this case series, we reviewed 3 patients initially treated for acquired demyelinating neuropathy that was later confirmed by pathologic testing and genetic analysis as aTTR. These patients had systemic symptoms and family records of sudden deaths that could not be explained by acquired demyelinating neuropathy. Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) is a treatable neuropathy; however, 20% to 33% of CIDP patients remain refractory to conventional immunotherapy, and incorrect diagnoses might be the cause of this therapeutic failure. This case series revealed that the electrophysiological findings of aTTR could resemble the findings of demyelinating neuropathy.


Transthyretin amyloidosis (aTTR) is a rare life-threatening systemic amyloidosis resulting from autosomal dominant mutations in the transthyretin (TTR) gene. Amyloid deposition in the peripheral nerves causes a form of polyneuropathy known as familial amyloidotic polyneuropathy [1].
Identification of demyelination features in the diagnosis of polyneuropathy is clinically important because of their treatable characteristics. Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) is a typical example of treatable acquired polyneuropathies. Patients with CIDP usually receive immunotherapy including intravenous immunoglobulin, plasmapheresis, or corticosteroids. However, 20% to 33% of CIDP patients remain refractory [2]. The refractory CIDP is not completely understood; however, incorrect diagnosis is considered to be among the causes of this therapeutic failure [3,4]. The most commonly used electrophysiological criteria for CIDP showed 80% of accuracy and this limitation can sometimes lead to misdiagnoses resulting to prescription of ineffective treatment [5,6].
We performed a retrospective review of 3 patients initially treated as acquired demyelinating polyneuropathy such as CIDP but finally confirmed as aTTR. This report was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) and the Pharmacy and Therapeutic Committees at Konkuk University Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea (No. KUH1170167). In consideration of the characteristics of medical record analysis, informed consent was waived by the IRB.

Case Reports

The clinical characteristics and the TTR gene mutations of the 3 aTTR patients are summarized in Table 1.

Case 1

This male patient initially exhibited paresthesia of both lower limbs at the age of 38. After 3 years of progression of the sensory symptoms, he developed weakness of his distal limbs in a length-dependent pattern. His mother had died of heart disease but there was no information on whether she had any form of neuropathy. On the initial nerve conduction study (NCS), a severe sensorimotor polyneuropathy was noted. Conduction block and increased duration of compound muscle action potential (CMAP) were presented on 3 nerves in both upper limbs (Table 2, Fig. 1). The laboratory tests excluded all other potential causes of demyelinating polyneuropathy. The patient was treated with oral prednisolone (1 mg/kg for a month) and intravenous immunoglobulin (over a course of 2 g/kg, divided within 5 days) without improvement. He further developed new symptoms, including orthostatic hypotension and diarrhea. Dilated cardiomyopathy was confirmed by echocardiography. After the presentation of autonomic symptoms, he was diagnosed with amyloidosis by colon tissue biopsy and was genetically confirmed to have a Lys35Asn mutation in the TTR gene.

Case 2

This female patient initially presented urinary incontinence at the age of 45, 2 years before the onset of the neuropathic symptoms. The patient had already been aware of her high arched foot in her 40s. She referred to the neurology department with progressive generalized weakness and anorexia. Her father had died in his 60s of an unknown cause. On neurological examination, amyotrophy of her feet and distal dominant weakness with sensory loss were noted. Upon electrophysiological examination, severe sensorimotor polyneuropathy was identified (Table 2). Late responses and motor nerve conduction of the lower limbs were not evoked, whereas significantly delayed terminal latencies, slow nerve conduction velocities and extended duration of CMAP were indicative of demyelinating neuropathy. Despite of the administration of steroids, her symptoms kept worsening and she complained of decreased visual acuity. Considering that cataract caused by steroids, she was subjected to ophthalmological examination. Nevertheless, the vitreous opacity was associated to amyloid deposit. Holter monitoring confirmed arrhythmia with right bundle branch block of suggesting systemic dispersion of amyloidosis. Genetic analysis demonstrated that the patient was heterozygous for the Lys35Asn mutation in the TTR gene.

Case 3

The third patient was a 46-year-old man who complained of weakness of distal lower limbs and paresthesia of all 4 limbs. He had lost 11 kg in 1 year, due to chronic diarrhea. On neurological examination, sensory loss and distal dominant weakness with a length-dependent pattern were noted. Upon electrophysiological examination, severe sensorimotor polyneuropathy was confirmed. On motor NCS, conduction block and increased duration of CMAP were presented on 2 nerves of both upper limbs (Table 2). Despite steroid treatment, he exhibited no clinical improvement. In addition to weakness progression, orthostatic hypotension occurred, and diarrhea got aggravated. However, he had no family members with similar symptoms. The possibility that the patient had amyloidosis was considered after the autonomic abnormalities significantly worsened. Gastrointestinal amyloidosis was confirmed by following colon tissue biopsy and the heterozygous mutation as Ala36Pro was detected in TTR gene.


NCS has been considered the gold standard for detecting segmental demyelination of peripheral nerves. Although electrophysiologic confirmation is key factor in diagnosis of acquired demyelinating polyneuropathies, they do not always accurately reflect the pathology of the disease [3]. A recent study showed 15% of demyelinating aTTR patients in French cohort (13 of 84 patients) and demonstrated misleading features of aTTR fulfilling electrodiagnostic criteria of CIDP are not uncommon in clinical practice [7]. In previous studies, the most notable features of NCS in aTTR fulfilling electrodiagnostic criteria of CIDP were pronged distal latency of the median nerve and the other is co-existence of severe motor axonal loss not only demyelinating features [7,8]. These features are also shown in all patients in this report (Table 2).
These 3 patients had significant clinical symptoms that could have also been considered as clues for correct diagnosis, such as gastrointestinal, urinary, or cardiac dysfunction. Moreover, the unevaluated causes for the sudden death of the patients’ parents were clue for the existence of a hereditary disease. All 3 patients initially received immunomodulatory treatment considering CIDP, but it might be also noticeable that all 3 patients presented distal dominant weakness. Although distal acquired demyelinating symmetric polyneuropathy and others (e.g., Lewis-Sumner syndrome, pure motor or pure sensory) are classified as subtypes of CIDP, they are still considered atypical and uncommon.
CIDP still has no typical biomarker diagnosed by the identification of characteristic electrophysiological findings. Because of their treatable characteristic, many clinicians might tend to try an early application of therapy considering the CIDP in the case of an incomplete diagnosis. In addition, the diagnostic criteria for refractory CIDP also have not yet been established. Steroids or immunoglobulins are usually applied as the first-line treatment, and if there is no effect, additional immunomodulatory treatment is performed. If there is no effect leading to remission in this series of treatments, it is considered refractory [9]. Yet, recent studies on CIDP reported that almost half of the patients referred for second opinion due to insufficient outcome of immunotherapy and were finally diagnosed with alternative diseases, with aTTR being the case for 5% of them [3,4]. Other diseases to consider when the final alternative diagnosis was made in patients with presumed refractory CIDP were diverse including diabetic polyneuropathy, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, multifocal motor neuropathy, idiopathic small fiber neuropathy, fibromyalgia and etc. Therefore, in the case of clinically refractory CIDP, the differential diagnosis may need to be re-examined [3,4].
Since current medical or surgical intervention can halt the progression of aTTR, early and correct diagnosis becomes an important issue. In conclusion, clinicians should be aware that the electrophysiological outcome of aTTR patients can sometimes mimic the findings of patients with a demyelinating disease.

Conflict of Interest

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Fig. 1.
Motor nerve conduction studies of case 1. A demyelinating pattern with conduction block and temporal dispersion was observed in the left median nerve (A) and the right ulnar nerve (B).
Table 1.
Summary of Patients’ Clinical Features
Patient Sex Age at onset (y) Age at diagnosis (y, genetic analysis) Main neurologic signs of neuropathy Combined systemic symptoms Mutation
1 Male 38 42 Distal dominant weakness and paresthesia of all limbs Diarrhea Lys35Asn
Generalized areflexia Arrhythmia
Orthostatic hypotension
2 Female 45 47 Distal dominant weakness of lower limbs Urinary incontinence Lys35Asn
Generalized areflexia Arrhythmia
Carpal tunnel syndrome Cataracts
3 Male 45 46 Distal dominant weakness of lower limbs Diarrhea Ala36Pro
Generalized areflexia Orthostatic hypotension
Table 2.
Patients’ Initial Nerve Conduction Studies
Nerve/site Latency(ms)*
Peak duration(ms)
Patient 1 Patient 2 Patient 3 Patient 1 Patient 2 Patient 3 Patient 1 Patient 2 Patient 3 Patient 1 Patient 2 Patient 3
Motor NCS
 Right median nerve
  Wrist 4.45 9.05 5.15 7.7 0.7 5.2 7.0 7.20 7.05
  Elbow 3.1 0.5 2.4 45.7 22.3 38.4 8.65 7.05 4.75
  Axilla 2.8 0.5 2.1 53.3 25.5 57.1 8.65 6.50 4.85
  F-wave 27.6 65.6 36.0
 Left median nerve
  Wrist 4.95 9.85 4.10 6.5 2.6 5.4 5.5 8.60 6.60
  Elbow 3.5 2.2 4.4 51.9 20.8 43.5 5.4 10.0 6.90
  Axilla 2.7 2.0 4.4 60.0 27.7 57.1 10.0 10.0 6.90
  F-wave 27.20 66.5 28.4
 Right ulnar nerve
  Wrist 3.60 7.05 6.40 6.8 2.7 0.9 6.50 7.55 5.95
  Below the elbow 3.0 1.5 0.7 54.1 15.7 20.2 5.85 8.05 8.80
  Above the elbow 3.0 1.5 0.6 62.1 19.4 34 9.10 9.60 9.40
  Axilla 2.9 1.4 0.6 66.7 18.6 60 9.60 10.6 8.65
  F-wave 25.9 NP 30.0
 Left ulnar nerve
  Wrist 4.60 6.6 3.80 7.1 3.0 5.6 6.50 8.25 7.60
  Below the elbow 3.7 1.6 2.6 41.2 15.8 45.5 8.70 11.0 7.75
  Above the elbow 3.4 1.6 2.6 48.6 16.6 48.6 11.0 11.5 7.20
  Axilla 2.9 1.6 2.6 52.6 26.2 60 10.2 11.5 7.05
  F-wave 29.7 NP 32.7
 Right common peroneal nerve NP NP NP
 Left common peroneal nerve NP NP NP
 Right tibial nerve NP NP NP
H-wave NP NP NP
 Left tibial nerve NP NP NP
H-wave NP NP NP
Sensory NCS
  Right median nerve
  Finger-wrist 2.95 2.3 NP NP 37.3
  Palm-wrist 2.55 3.6 NP NP 39.2
  Wrist-elbow 4.50 4.85 7.8 NP 10.0 46.7 41.2
  Elbow-axilla 2.35 2.05 2.20 33.5 5.7 22.2 51.1 53.7 54.5
  Left median nerve
  Finger-wrist 3.15 NP NP 4 41.3
  Palm-wrist 2.75 NP NP 4.1 43.6
  Wrist-elbow 4.70 4.70 9.6 NP 11.2 44.7 44.7
  Elbow-axilla 2.40 2.75 2.15 39.8 9.6 54.3 50.0 43.6 55.8
  Right ulnar nerve
  Finger-wrist NP NP NP
  Palm-wrist NP NP NP
  Wrist-elbow 4.40 5.20 7.4 NP 5.4 45.5 36.5
  Elbow-axilla 2.45 2.85 2.45 26.2 2.7 7.4 49.0 42.1 49.0
  Left ulnar nerve
  Finger-wrist 3.15 NP NP 1.1 38.1
  Palm-wrist 2.50 NP NP 2.7 44.0
  Wrist-elbow 5.00 NP NP 6.2 44.0
  Elbow-axilla 2.72 2.40 2.35 33.5 4.6 11.3 43.6 45.8 51.1
  Right sural nerve NP NP NP
  Left sural nerve NP NP NP
 Right superficial peroneal nerve NP NP NP
  Left superficial peroneal nerve NP NP NP

Amplitudes are measured in millivolt (mV, motor NCS) and microvolt (μV, sensory NCS).

NCV, nerve conduction velocity; NCS, nerve conduction study; NP, no potential.

* Motor NCS: terminal latency, sensory NCS: latency.


1. Ando Y, Nakamura M, Araki S: Transthyretin-related familial amyloidotic polyneuropathy. Arch Neurol 2005;62:1057-1062.
2. Cocito D, Paolasso I, Antonini G, Benedetti L, Briani C, Comi C, et al: A nationwide retrospective analysis on the effect of immune therapies in patients with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy. Eur J Neurol 2010;17:289-294.
crossref pmid
3. Kaplan A, Brannagan TH 3rd: Evaluation of patients with refractory chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy. Muscle Nerve 2017;55:476-482.
4. Allen JA, Lewis RA: CIDP diagnostic pitfalls and perception of treatment benefit. Neurology 2015;85:498-504.
5. Van den Bergh PY, Hadden RD, Bouche P, Cornblath DR, Hahn A, Illa I, et al: European Federation of Neurological Societies/Peripheral Nerve Society guideline on management of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy: report of a joint task force of the European Federation of Neurological Societies and the Peripheral Nerve Society-first revision. Eur J Neurol 2010;17:356-363.

6. Breiner A, Brannagan TH 3rd: Comparison of sensitivity and specificity among 15 criteria for chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy. Muscle Nerve 2014;50:40-46.
crossref pmid pmc
7. Lozeron P, Mariani LL, Dodet P, Beaudonnet G, Théaudin M, Adam C, et al: Transthyretin amyloid polyneuropathies mimicking a demyelinating polyneuropathy. Neurology 2018;91:e143-e152.
8. Gondim FAA, Filha JGH, Jordanova A: Transthyretin familial amyloid polyneuropathy due to lle107Val mutation mimicking atypical chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy: case report. Acta Neurol Belg 2020;120:201-203.
crossref pdf
9. Godil J, Barrett MJ, Ensrud E, Chahin N, Karam C: Refractory CIDP: Clinical characteristics, antibodies and response to alternative treatment. J Neurol Sci 2020;418:117098.


Browse all articles >

Editorial Office
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Korea University Ansan Hospital
123 Jeokgeum-ro, Danwon-gu, Ansan-si, Gyeonggi-do, 15355 Korea
Tel: +82-31-412-5330    Fax: +82-31-412-4215    E-mail: editjend@gmail.com                

Copyright © 2022 by Korean Association of EMG Electrodiagnostic Medicine.

Developed in M2PI

Close layer
prev next